HR+, HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
Disease Heterogeneity and 1L Treatment
Hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2-) is the most common subtype of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), representing approximately 73% of all cases.1 HR+, HER2- breast cancer can be further categorized based on gene expression patterns, histological features, clinical and biological properties, and response to treatment.2,3
Approximately 60% of patients with advanced HR+, HER2- breast cancer have ≥1 disease-related factor more likely to confer a poor prognosis.4 These include negative progesterone receptor (PgR) status, visceral metastases, liver metastases (a subset of visceral metastases), and high tumor grade.4
HR+, HER2- MBC: Factors Likely to Confer a Poor Prognosis
Negative PgR status
Visceral metastases
Liver metastases (a subset of visceral metastases)
High tumor grade
Patients with HR+, HER2- MBC harboring ≥1 prognostic factor displayed a significantly shorter real-world progression-free survival and overall survival compared to those with no prognostic factors.5 In addition, outcomes for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC vary depending on the presence of certain prognostic factors.6-8
Patients who lack PgR expression displayed a lower disease-free survival than patients with PgR expression.6
Patients with visceral metastases had a worse overall survival than patients with bone-only metastases.7
Patients with high-grade tumors or intermediate-grade tumors showed worse overall survival than patients with low-grade tumors.8
Endocrine therapy (ET) remains the backbone of therapy for estrogen receptor–positive (ER+), HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) following 30 years of therapeutic advancement.9,10 Three classes of ETs are approved to target the estrogen pathway in patients with ER+, HER2- MBC, including aromatase inhibitors (AIs), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs).9,11,12
Standard treatment for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC includes ET + cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i).13,14 Treatment with ET + CDK4/6i improves outcomes when compared to treatment with ET alone.15,16
- In a pooled analysis of randomized trials of ET ± CDK4/6i in patients with HR+, HER2- MBC approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, the addition of CDK4/6i resulted in 41% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (CDK4/6i in the pooled analysis included palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib; ET in the pooled analysis included AI or fulvestrant)15
- Patients treated with ET + CDK4/6i in first-line (1L) or greater settings derived similar progression-free survival benefits, regardless of de novo metastatic status, site of metastasis, and histological classification, when compared to those treated with ET alone15
As healthcare providers, it is important to identify patients with HR+, HER2- MBC who may be at risk for less optimal outcomes based on clinical and pathological factors, and to understand the benefits of ET + CDK4/6i for 1L treatment. Additional information on MBC trials with ET + CKD4/6i can be found in linked resources below.
References
- Howlader N, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(5):dju055.
- Eliyatkin N, et al. J Breast Health. 2015;11(2):59-66.
- Prat A, et al. Breast. 2015;24(suppl 2):S26-S35.
- Davie A, et al. ESMO Open. 2021;6(4):100226.
- Vidal GA, et al. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(4):317-328.e7.
- Sun J-Y, et al. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:1707-1713.
- Solomayer E-F, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;59(3):271-278.
- Dalton LW, et al. Mod Pathol. 2000;13(7):730-735.
- Chen YC, et al. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2022;31(6):515-529.
- Patel R, et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023;9(20). doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00523-4
- Le Romancer M, et al. Endocr Rev. 2011;32(5):597-622
- Patel HK, Bihani T. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;186:1-24.
- Gennari A, et al. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(12):1475-1495.
- Burstein HJ, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(35):3959-3977.
- Gao JJ, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):250-260.
- Gao JJ, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(11):1573-1581.
VV-MED-156150
Please rate your satisfaction with the content on the following statements:
Very Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very Satisfied