Skip To Main Content
Lilly
Menu closed
Lilly
  • Account Login / Register
  • Medical Home
  • Medical Education
      • All Therapeutic Areas
        • Alopecia Areata
        • Atopic Dermatitis
        • Dermatology
        • Psoriasis
        • Diabetes
        • Hypoglycemia
        • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
        • Crohn's Disease
        • Ulcerative Colitis
        • Migraine
        • Alzheimer's Disease
        • Cognitive Health
        • Obesity
        • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
        • Breast Cancer - Early
        • Breast Cancer - Metastatic
        • Hematological Malignancy
        • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
        • Oncology Precision Medicine
        • Thyroid Cancer
        • Axial Spondyloarthritis
        • Psoriatic Arthritis
        • Resources
      • All Therapeutic Areas
        • Alopecia Areata
        • Atopic Dermatitis
        • Psoriasis
        • Diabetes
        • Hypoglycemia
        • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
        • Cluster Headache
        • Migraine
        • Alzheimer's Disease
        • Cognitive Health
        • Obesity
        • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
        • Breast Cancer - Metastatic
        • Gastrointestinal Cancer
        • Hematological Malignancy
        • Oncology
        • Osteoporosis
        • Rheumatoid Arthritis
        • Resources
  • Independent Medical Education
    • Cardiovascular
      • Alopecia Areata
      • Atopic Dermatitis
      • Psoriasis
      • Diabetes
      • Crohn's Disease
      • Ulcerative Colitis
      • Migraine
      • Alzheimer's Disease
      • Obesity
      • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
      • Breast Cancer
      • Gastrointestinal Cancer
      • Hematological Malignancy
      • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
      • Oncology
      • Oncology Precision Medicine
      • Prostate Cancer
      • Axial Spondyloarthritis
      • Psoriatic Arthritis
  • Chat Contact Us
Lilly

You are now leaving the Lilly Medical Education website

The link you clicked on will take you to a site maintained by a third party, which is solely responsible for its content. Lilly USA, LLC does not control, influence, or endorse this site, and the opinions, claims, or comments expressed on this site should not be attributed to Lilly USA, LLC. Lilly USA, LLC is not responsible for the privacy policy of any third-party websites. We encourage you to read the privacy policy of every website you visit.
Click "Continue" to proceed or "Return" to return to Lilly Medical Education.

HR+, HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

Loading icon

Overview

1L Treatment

Unmet Needs

ESR1m

ET Advancements

Disease Heterogeneity and 1L Treatment

HR+, HER2- MBC: A Heterogeneous Disease

Hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2-) is the most common subtype of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), representing approximately 73% of all cases.1 HR+, HER2- breast cancer can be further categorized based on gene expression patterns, histological features, clinical and biological properties, and response to treatment.2,3

Approximately 60% of patients with advanced HR+, HER2- breast cancer have ≥1 disease-related factor more likely to confer a poor prognosis.4 These include negative progesterone receptor (PgR) status, visceral metastases, liver metastases (a subset of visceral metastases), and high tumor grade.4

HR+, HER2- MBC: Factors Likely to Confer a Poor Prognosis

Negative PgR status

Visceral metastases

Liver metastases (a subset of visceral metastases)

High tumor grade

Patients with HR+, HER2- MBC harboring ≥1 prognostic factor displayed a significantly shorter real-world progression-free survival and overall survival compared to those with no prognostic factors.5 In addition, outcomes for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC vary depending on the presence of certain prognostic factors.6-8

Patients who lack PgR expression displayed a lower disease-free survival than patients with PgR expression.6

Disease-free survival rates by PgR status: either positive or negative PgR status for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC.

Disease-free survival as a function of time since mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery based on PgR status. X-axis displays years since mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery, from 0 to 12 years, and Y-axis displays rate of disease-free survival, from 0.0 to 1.0. Both PgR status groups begin at a disease-free survival rate of 1.0 at 0 years with a gradual decline to approximately 0.75 at around 12 years. Over 0 to 12 years, patients with PgR-positive status display a higher rate of disease-free survival when compared to those with PgR-negative status.6

Patients with visceral metastases had a worse overall survival than patients with bone-only metastases.7

Probability of survival by site of metastases: either bone only, visceral only, or bone and visceral metastases for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC.

Probability of survival as a function of time since first distant metastases based on site of metastases. X-axis displays months after first distant metastases, from 0 to 120 months, and Y-axis displays probability of survival, from 0.0 to 1.0. All groups begin with a probability of survival rate of 1.0 at 0 months with a decline to approximately 0.0 at 120 months. Patients with bone-only metastases show a higher probability of survival when compared to those with bone and visceral metastases or visceral-only metastases.7

Patients with high-grade tumors or intermediate-grade tumors showed worse overall survival than patients with low-grade tumors.8

Probability of survival by tumor grade: either low, intermediate, or high grade for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC.

Probability of survival as a function of time since breast cancer diagnosis based on tumor grade. X-axis displays years since breast cancer diagnosis, from 0 to 15 years, and Y-axis displays probability of survival, from 0.0 to 1.0. All groups begin with a probability of survival rate of 1.0 at 0 years with a gradual decline to approximately 0.9 to 0.5 at around 15 years. In general, patients with low grade tumors show a higher probability of survival, followed by those with intermediate grade tumors; those harboring high grade tumors display a lower probability of survival.8

ET in ER+, HER2- MBC

Endocrine therapy (ET) remains the backbone of therapy for estrogen receptor–positive (ER+), HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) following 30 years of therapeutic advancement.9,10 Three classes of ETs are approved to target the estrogen pathway in patients with ER+, HER2- MBC, including aromatase inhibitors (AIs), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs).9,11,12

Types of ET include AI, SERM, and SERD. Types of ET include AI, SERM, and SERD.

  • AIs prevent estrogen conversion from precursor molecules9,10
  • SERMs interact with ER to modify ER activity9,10
  • SERDs lead to intranuclear immobilization and cytosolic degradation of ER9,10

Standard Treatment for Patients With HR+, HER2- MBC

Standard treatment for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC includes ET + cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i).13,14 Treatment with ET + CDK4/6i improves outcomes when compared to treatment with ET alone.15,16

  • In a pooled analysis of randomized trials of ET ± CDK4/6i in patients with HR+, HER2- MBC approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, the addition of CDK4/6i resulted in 41% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (CDK4/6i in the pooled analysis included palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib; ET in the pooled analysis included AI or fulvestrant)15
  • Patients treated with ET + CDK4/6i in first-line (1L) or greater settings derived similar progression-free survival benefits, regardless of de novo metastatic status, site of metastasis, and histological classification, when compared to those treated with ET alone15

Doctor discussing clinical and pathological factors with a patient.
Approximately 60% of patients with advanced HR+, HER2- breast cancer have ≥1 disease-related factor more likely to confer a poor prognosis.4

As healthcare providers, it is important to identify patients with HR+, HER2- MBC who may be at risk for less optimal outcomes based on clinical and pathological factors, and to understand the benefits of ET + CDK4/6i for 1L treatment. Additional information on MBC trials with ET + CKD4/6i can be found in linked resources below.

Related Resources

Downloadable PDFs

Download PDF Medical Answer PDF Document Created with Sketch. INFOGRAPHIC: A Heterogenous Disease with Varied Clinical Outcomes: HR+/HER2- MBC

This infographic is intended to educate healthcare providers on the heterogeneity of HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer, factors more likely to confer a poorer prognosis, and information on the standard first-line treatment for patients.

Download PDF Medical Answer PDF Document Created with Sketch. INFOGRAPHIC: Classes of ETs: Targeting the Estrogen Pathway in ER+, HER2-, ABC

This infographic introduces ER+, HER2-, ABC, how the estrogen pathway is being targeted by 3 classes of endocrine therapies (ET), and the unmet needs that remain.

Download PDF Medical Answer PDF Document Created with Sketch. DECK: Non-Endocrine Targeted Treatments for HR+, HER2- MBC

This slide deck provides an overview of non-endocrine, targeted treatment options in HR+, HER2- MBC, including information on the MOA of different therapy classes and the phase 2/3 clinical studies for approved therapies in this setting.



(00:00) Light music and animation

(00:11)
Hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer is the most common subtype of invasive breast cancer, representing 70% of all cases. The standard first-line (1L) treatment approach for our patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic disease is a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET). However, treatment outcomes for patients may vary depending on the breast cancer subtype and the underlying disease heterogeneity. To provide the most effective and personalized care for patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic disease, it's crucial to understand how disease heterogeneity can impact clinical outcomes.

(00:48) Music swells. Question animates on screen. Drops to reveal speaker.

HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) can be further categorized into distinct subtypes based on gene expression patterns, histology, clinical and biologic properties, and response to treatment. Some of these subtypes are clinically relevant because they have prognostic value. Prognostic factors in the metastatic setting include progesterone receptor (PgR) status, presence of visceral metastasis, presence of liver metastasis, and high-grade tumor.

(01:20) Music swells. Question animates on screen. Drops to reveal speaker.

Patients who lack PgR expression have a worse disease-free survival than patients with PgR expression. Patients who have visceral and beyond bone-only metastases have worse overall survival than patients with bone-only metastases. Patients with high-grade or intermediate-grade tumors have worse overall survival than patients with low-grade tumors. In addition, not all HR+, HER2- tumors respond the same way to ET. Studies have shown that approximately 20% of patients do not respond to ET plus CDK4/6i in the 1L setting, and unfortunately, patients will develop resistance over time after an initial response.

(02:07) Music swells. Question animates on screen. Drops to reveal speaker.

Most women with MBC have more than 1 prognostic factor that we need to take into consideration when thinking about what's the best therapy for them. This does introduce a little bit more complexity as we think through what the best therapy is for an individual woman. As healthcare providers, it's important to identify patients with HR+, HER2- metastatic disease who may be at risk for less-than-optimal outcomes based on their clinical and pathologic factors and also to understand who really is likely to benefit from CDK4/6i therapy plus ET in the 1L setting.

Understanding the Impact of Heterogeneity on Prognosis in HR+, HER2- MBC

Dr Joyce O’Shaughnessy reviews HR+, HER2- MBC disease heterogeneity and how risk factors affect patient prognosis and clinical outcomes.


(00:00) Light music and animation

(00:15)
Let’s take a look at what the standard treatment is for patients who develop metastatic breast cancer (MBC)—their first-line (1L) treatment, if they have hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. I really think the standard of care has become very clear over the last 5+ years as we’ve seen the combination of endocrine therapy (ET) plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) improve progression-free survival (PFS). We’ve seen this in the 1L in multiple phase 3 studies.
The results of these multiple phase 3 trials have led international guideline committees all around the world to recommend CDK4/6i plus ET as the standard of care for the initial treatment of women who have developed MBC, HR+, HER2- metastatic disease except in the very small percentage of women who have true visceral crisis, life-threatening visceral disease.

(01:20) Fade on full-screen question followed by full-screen graphic build.

In the PALOMA-2 study, 666 patients were randomized 2:1 between the palbociclib plus letrozole arm and the placebo plus letrozole arm. Palbociclib and letrozole showed superior PFS with a median PFS of 24.8 months compared with 14.5 months with letrozole alone with a hazard ratio of 0.58.
OS was similar in both treatment arms.

(01:47) Full-screen graphic builds. Speaker voice-over

In the MONALEESA-2 study, 668 patients were randomized 1:1 between the ribociclib and letrozole arm and the placebo plus letrozole arm. Ribociclib plus letrozole showed superior PFS with a median PFS of 25.3 months compared with 16 months with letrozole alone with a hazard ratio of 0.57 and an OS advantage with a hazard ratio of 0.76.

(02:17) Full-screen graphic builds. Speaker voice-over.

In the MONALEESA-7 trial, 672 premenopausal women were randomized 1:1 between the ribociclib plus ET arm or placebo plus ET arm. Ribociclib plus ET showed a superior PFS with a median PFS of 23.8 months compared with 13 months with ET alone with a hazard ratio of 0.55 and an OS advantage with a hazard ratio of 0.71.

(02:50) Full-screen graphic builds. Speaker voice-over.

In the MONARCH-3 study, 493 patients were randomized 2:1 between the Abemaciclib and anastrozole or letrozole arm or the placebo plus anastrozole or letrozole arm. Abemaciclib plus anastrozole or letrozole showed superior PFS with a median PFS of 29 months compared with 14.8 months with aromatase inhibitor therapy alone with a hazard ratio of 0.54. OS was numerically but not statistically improved with a hazard ratio of 0.80.
We should not make cross-trial comparisons due to the lack of head-to-head studies and differences in the study populations.

(03:34) Music swells. Question animates on screen. Drops to reveal speaker.

All 3 of the approved CDK4/6i cause neutropenia. Complete blood counts should be monitored prior to starting therapy and throughout treatment as clinically indicated.
It’s important for healthcare providers and their patients to work together to understand treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), review methods to manage side effects, and develop an individualized treatment plan. For patients who develop TRAEs, dose reduction or treatment discontinuation may be required.

(04:09 – 05:08) Light music.

(05:08) Light music and animation

CDK4/6i have made a really big impact in broadening treatment options for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC. CDK inhibitors available in the adjuvant setting may change the landscape of treatments in the metastatic setting. Alternative therapies to CDK4/6i and ET are also needed in certain patient subgroups, for example, those with comorbidities or low-performance status, those at risk for hematologic adverse events, and for patients with ESR1 mutations.
Despite the efficacy of CDK4/6i and ET in the 1L setting, we need a better understanding of the optimal treatment in the second-line setting and beyond and how to personalize treatment for these patients.

(05:58 – 06:00) Light music and animation.

CDK4/6 Inhibitors in 1L HR+, HER2- MBC

Dr Joyce O’Shaughnessy reviews the 1L SOC for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC with a focus on approved CDK4/6i and their associated clinical trials.

References

  1. Howlader N, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(5):dju055.
  2. Eliyatkin N, et al. J Breast Health. 2015;11(2):59-66.
  3. Prat A, et al. Breast. 2015;24(suppl 2):S26-S35.
  4. Davie A, et al. ESMO Open. 2021;6(4):100226.
  5. Vidal GA, et al. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(4):317-328.e7.
  6. Sun J-Y, et al. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:1707-1713.
  7. Solomayer E-F, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;59(3):271-278.
  8. Dalton LW, et al. Mod Pathol. 2000;13(7):730-735.
  9. Chen YC, et al. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2022;31(6):515-529.
  10. Patel R, et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023;9(20). doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00523-4
  11. Le Romancer M, et al. Endocr Rev. 2011;32(5):597-622
  12. Patel HK, Bihani T. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;186:1-24.
  13. Gennari A, et al. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(12):1475-1495.
  14. Burstein HJ, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(35):3959-3977.
  15. Gao JJ, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):250-260.
  16. Gao JJ, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(11):1573-1581.

VV-MED-156150

Please rate your satisfaction with the content on the following statements:

Very Dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Neutral

Satisfied

Very Satisfied

Credibility of information
Credibility of information
Relevance of the information to my needs
Relevance of the information to my needs
Confidence to implement the learnings in my clinical practice
Confidence to implement the learnings in my clinical practice

Please rate your satisfaction with the content on the following statements:

Credibility of information
Credibility of information
Very Satisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Relevance of the information to my needs
Relevance of the information to my needs
Very Satisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Confidence to implement the learnings in my clinical practice
Confidence to implement the learnings in my clinical practice
Very Satisfied
Very Dissatisfied
  • Copyright
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Consumer Health Privacy Notice
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Sitemap

To speak to customer support:
Call (XXX) XXX-XXXX

This site is intended for US Healthcare Professionals only.

4.4.53 05/2025 | GLOOTH00001 04/2015 | © Lilly USA, LLC 2025. All rights reserved.

Product names listed above are trademarks or registered trademarks owned by or licensed to Eli Lilly and Company, its subsidiaries, or affiliates

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Opt-Out Icon Your Privacy Choices
Cookie Settings
Facebook X LinkedIn
Lilly