You are now leaving the Lilly Medical Education website
The link you clicked on will take you to a site maintained by a third party, which is solely responsible for its content. Lilly USA, LLC does not control, influence, or endorse this site, and the opinions, claims, or comments expressed on this site should not be attributed to Lilly USA, LLC. Lilly USA, LLC is not responsible for the privacy policy of any third-party websites. We encourage you to read the privacy policy of every website you visit.
Click "Continue" to proceed or "Return" to return to Lilly Medical Education.
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
What is CLL?
Distinction between CLL and SLL1
CLL is the most common type of chronic leukemia characterized by aberrant proliferation of mature monoclonal B cells in the bone marrow. CLL and SLL are denoted as “CLL/SLL” because they are different manifestations of the same disease.1
Median age at diagnosis is 70 years with incidence increasing with age3
More common in men3
Highest incidence in Caucasian population and Western countries1
Genetic basis and can develop in families. First-degree relatives of patients with CLL have double the risk of CLL1
Diagnosis
Patient history and physical examination
Laboratory testing
Histopathology
Immunophenotyping
Test type
|
Diagnostic test
|
Finding necessary for establishing a diagnosis of CLL³,⁴
|
|---|---|---|
| Laboratory testing | Diagnostic test: Complete blood count | Finding necessary for establishing a diagnosis of CLL³,⁴: ≥5000 B lymphocytes/µL in the peripheral blood for at least 3 months |
| Histopathology | Diagnostic test: Blood smear | Finding necessary for establishing a diagnosis of CLL³,⁴: Leukemic cells in blood smear are typically small, mature lymphocytes and have a narrow border of cytoplasm, a dense nucleus without discernible nuclei, and partially aggregated chromatin |
| Immunophenotyping | Diagnostic test: Flow cytometry | Finding necessary for establishing a diagnosis of CLL³,⁴: Confirms clonality of circulating B lymphocytes; usually positive for CD5 antigen and the B-cell markers, CD23 and CD19; weak expression of surface membrane immunoglobulin (CD20 and CD79b) |
For more information on CLL diagnosis, please see CLL slide deck and infographic in the related resources at the bottom of the page.
CLL is usually asymptomatic and discovered via routine blood tests1
Unexplained fevers (>100.5 °F)
Unintentional weight loss (≥10% over 6 months or less)
Night sweats
Early satiety
Fatigue
Swollen lymph nodes
Increased frequency of infections
Autoimmune cytopenia
Enlarged liver or spleen
Risk of progression
Results of evaluating lymphocytosis
Degree of lymph node, spleen, and liver enlargement
Presence of anemia
Presence of thrombocytopenia
CLL-IPI: The CLL-IPI combines genetic, biochemical, and clinical parameters into a prognostic model with 4 risk subgroups: low, intermediate, high, and very high.
prognostication of CLL7,8
Rai Staging System (Primarily United States)9
Stage/risk
|
Characteristics
|
|---|---|
| 0 (Low) | Characteristics: Lymphocytosis, lymphocytes in blood >5 x 10⁹/L clonal B cells and/or >40% lymphocytes in the bone marrow |
| I (Intermediate) | Characteristics: Lymphocytosis with enlarged node(s) |
| II (Intermediate) | Characteristics: Lymphocytosis with splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or both |
| III (High) | Characteristics: Lymphocytosis with anemia (hemoglobin <11.0 g/dL or hematocrit <33%) |
| IV (High) | Characteristics: Lymphocytosis with thrombocytopenia (platelets <100,000/µL) |
Binet Staging System (Primarily Europe)10
Stage
|
Characteristics
|
|---|---|
| A | Characteristics: <3 areas of lymphoid tissue are enlarged, with no anemia or thrombocytopenia |
| B | Characteristics: ≥3 areas of lymphoid tissue are enlarged, with no anemia or thrombocytopenia |
| C | Characteristics: Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL) and/or thrombocytopenia (platelets <100,000/µL) are present, with any number of enlarged areas |
Table outlining CLL-IPI risk group criteria and scoring system based on age (≤65 years = 0 points, >65 years = 1 point), clinical stage (Binet A or Rai 0 = 0 points, Binet B-C or Rai I-IV = 1 point), serum β2M (in mg/L or μ/mL; ≤3.5 = 0 points, >3.5 = 2 points), IGHV mutational status (mutated = 0 points, unmutated = 2 points) and TP53 status (no abnormality = 0 points, deletion 17p [FISH] and/or TP53 mutation [sequencing] = 4 points).
5-year Survival by CLL-IPI Risk Group3,11
CLL-IPI score
|
Risk
|
5-year survival
|
|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | Risk: Low | 5-year survival: 93.2% |
| 2-3 | Risk: Intermediate | 5-year survival: 79.3% |
| 4-6 | Risk: High | 5-year survival: 63.3% |
| 7-10 | Risk: Very High | 5-year survival: 23.3% |
High-risk CLL
High-risk CLL is based on a combination of factors, including genomic biomarkers, as well as patient- and treatment-related risk factors12
Factors associated with high-risk CLL include genomic biomarkers (del[17p]/TP53 mutation, cytogenetic complexity, unmutated IGHV and del[11q]), treatment-related factors (intolerance toward a targeted therapy and resistance mutations in BTK, PLCG2, and BCL2), and patient-related risk factors (clinical stage: Binet C or Rai III/IV, age >65 years, contraindication to a targeted therapy, and restricted access to CLL specialists or targeted therapy).
Identifying high-risk CLL in patients diagnosed with CLL involves clinical staging (Rai or Binet system), analysis of cytogenetic complexity (complex karyotype [≥3 CA], high complex karyotype [≥5 CA], or noncomplex karyotype), chromosomal aberrations [including del(17p), del(11q), del(13q) and trisomy 12], and molecular biomarkers (TP53 and/or IGHV), and can help with optimal assessment of treatment options and likely outcomes.
High-risk CLL by clinical staging systems3,7
High-risk CLL—Binet
Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL)
Thrombocytopenia (platelets <100 x 109/L)
Any number of areas of lymphoid tissue enlargement
Referred to as stage C
High-risk CLL—Rai
Lymphocytosis in blood and/or bone marrow
AND
Anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dL)
OR
Thrombocytopenia (platelets <100 x 109/L)
Referred to as high risk or stage III/IV
Genomic Biomarkers used in CLL prognostication
Biomarker testing is performed at diagnosis to derive prognostic and predictive information from genetic mutations and chromosomal abnormalities associated with CLL, which can inform the treatment plan7
The following biomarkers are associated with poor prognosis in patients with CLL
Del(17p)7,15
TP53 mutation8
IGHV unmutated7,14,15
Complex karyotype16
For patients with CLL in which treatment is indicated, the presence or absence of del(17p) and TP53 mutations are most often used to direct treatment selection14

In some cases, acquired resistance during CLL treatment can necessitate additional biomarker testing prior to beginning a new line of therapy17,18
Approximately 80% of patients with CLL carry at least 1 of 4 chromosomal alterations (listed below)3
Chromosomal alteration
|
Description
|
Frequency
|
Risk
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Del(13q) | Description: Critical region of del(13q14) contains miRNAs that regulate apoptosis and cell-cycle progression³,¹⁹ | Frequency: 55% of patients with CLL³ | Risk: Favorable prognosis when alone³,¹⁹ |
| Del(11q) | Description: Frequently encompasses 11q23, which harbors the ATM gene; associated with bulky lymphoma and rapid progression³ | Frequency: 10% of early disease 25% of advanced disease³,ᵃ | Risk: Poor prognosis³,¹⁹ |
| Trisomy 12 | Description: Role in CLL pathogenesis unclear; may be more common in SLL and cases with Richter transformation³,¹⁹ | Frequency: 10%-20% of patients with CLL³ | Risk: Intermediate prognosis³,¹⁹ |
| Del(17p) | Description: 17p13 harbors the TP53 gene, which encodes tumor suppressor protein P53³ | Frequency: 5%-8% of chemotherapy-naïve patients with CLL³ | Risk: Poor prognosis; resistance to genotoxic chemotherapies³ |
aChemotherapy naïve.
Related Resources
Downloadable PDFs
In this slide deck, HCPs will gain deeper knowledge of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) including epidemiology, biomarkers, diagnosis, staging, and prognosis.
This infographic provides an overview of CLL epidemiology, diagnosis, disease staging, prognostic biomarkers, and treatment considerations.
This infographic is intended to provide Health Care Providers with an overview Biomarkers and provide insight into a patient's risk stratification and potential response to CLL therapies.
Understanding High-Risk CLL in the Era of Targeted Therapies
(00:09) Lindsey Roeker:
So over the last decade, we have had development of major classes of drugs that have really revolutionized how we treat CLL. So when I'm meeting a patient and talking to them about their first therapy, there are a few considerations. The first is there is still a minority of patients who might be good chemoimmunotherapy candidates. Typically, we think of these as young, fit patients with mutated IGHV, and we know that these are patients that can have long-term remissions with chemoimmunotherapy. So I have that as part of my discussion.
(00:41) Lindsey Roeker:
So for the vast majority of patients, we are talking about a novel agent-based approach. We have BTK inhibitors that are given as continuous therapies, and we have BCL-2 inhibitor based therapies, which can be given as time limited therapies. These are two classes of agents that have different side effect profiles, different logistics of administration, and really are a different experience for patients. So it's important that we educate them on what to expect with each of these classes.
(01:08) Lindsey Roeker:
So after that frontline therapy, when I'm thinking about their next line of therapy, I really take stock of what they've received before and why did they stop it? So for patients who were on covalent BTK inhibitors, did they stop because of intolerance where we might have lots of different options? Or did they stop because of progression, where the options are really continuing to inhibit BTK, but with a different mechanism, or using a different class of drug.
(01:35) Meghan Thompson:
So I think that's really important, knowing why the patient discontinued the prior therapy. Was it intolerance? Was it progression? And then as a clinician, I'm often faced with that decision and I really take a look at the most recent data, what's out there, what tools are available in terms of treatments. Sometimes it's switching to another target or mechanism of action, different class of drug. And then there are also drugs available that focus on the same target, but in a different way
What factors do you consider when treating patients with CLL?
Dr. Lindsey Roeker and Dr. Meghan Thompson discuss their thoughts on treatment options for CLL.
(00:09) Lindsey Roeker:
So for any person that I'm meeting for their first visit, usually that's at the time of diagnosis, I talk about doing some prognostic testing.
(00:22) Lindsey Roeker:
I tell people I'm doing this because it tells me what to expect, it doesn't tell me what to do. But at that point, I do IGHV mutational testing. I do some form of karyotype analysis. At our center we use fish, and then we use snip array, which gives us basically a karyotype look. Some centers use karyotype in a stimulated type setting in the peripheral blood. Then, we also do molecular testing. We look for TP53 aberrations, and at our center, we have a panel that looks for other mutations as well.
(00:49) Lindsey Roeker:
That testing really gives us a sense of what to expect. Doesn't tell us what to do, but it does tell us some prognostic information that can be helpful for counseling patients
That's what I do at the time of diagnosis. When patients are going to the point that they need to be treated. I also repeat the testing. I want to make sure, have they picked up some new genetic abnormalities? That includes repeating the cytogenetic testing and the molecular testing. Once you test IGHV mutational status, you don't have to test again because that's not going to change through the disease course. I really use it at diagnosis and then right before I'm starting a line of therapy. If a patient is progressing, that's another time that I perform some of this testing. I look for whether there are resistance mutations. We have availability of that testing, so it's relatively easy to do. But at the time of progression, you know that there probably has been some genetic aberration that's led to that progression event, so it's good to get a sense of what that genetic change has been.
(01:51) Meghan Thompson:
Absolutely. I have a very similar approach to you, Dr. Roeker, in terms of the testing when I meet a patient doing the IGHV testing, the P53 testing, looking for both the deletion of 17P by fish, as well as a TP53 mutation by next generation sequencing or another DNA sequencing method. I think one major takeaway point though that I would also emphasize and add on is that this testing doesn't make that determination, does the patient need treatment or not? That really is the signs and symptoms that the CLL or SLL has causing adenopathy that's progressive, progressive cytopenia, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms such as weight loss, drenching, night sweats, fatigue, or fevers without another etiology. Those are still the determination to start treatment, but this prognostic testing can really provide a lot of information prior to starting the initial therapy and then at each line of therapy
(02:59) Lindsey Roeker:
We can use that prognostic information to counsel people upfront. Then, when we're selecting therapies, we also use some of that data to help us understand what to expect from our line of therapy. Does this person have high risk disease, a P53 aberration, where we expect that the line of therapy might not have the same progression-free survival as someone without that aberration? It does help us anticipate what to expect.
What is your approach to prognostic testing in CLL?
Dr. Lindsey Roeker and Dr. Meghan Thompson share their approach to prognostic testing in CLL at diagnosis and relapse.
References
- Mukkamalla SKR, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. [Updated 2023 Mar 7]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470433/
- SEER. Cancer Stat Facts: Leukemia — Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). Accessed August 12, 2024. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/clyl.html
- Hallek M, Al-Sawaf O. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(12):1679-1705.
- Hallek M. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(11):1266-1287.
- Kay NE, et al. Blood Rev. 2022;54:100930.
- Lynch DT, et al. Mantle cell lymphoma. [Updated 2023 Jul 28]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536985/
- Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Accessed August 12, 2024. https://www.lls.org/sites/default/files/2023-07/PS34_CLL_Booklet_2023.pdf
- Stefaniuk P, et al. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:1459-1476.
- Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Accessed August 12, 2024. https://www.lls.org/sites/default/files/file_assets/PS34_CLL_Booklet_2019_FINAL.pdf
- Eichhorst B, et al. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(1):23-33.
- International CLL-IPI Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):779-790.
- Edelmann J, et al. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1106579.
- Martinelli S, et al. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2016;8(1):e2016047.
- Campo E, et al. Haematologica. 2018;103(12):1956-1968.
- Yun X et al. Biomark Res. 2020;8:40.
- Baliakas P, et al. Blood. 2019;133(11):1205-1216.
- Shadman M. JAMA. 2023;329(11):918-932.
- Hallek M, et al. Blood. 2018;131(25):2745-2760.
- Lee J, Wang YL. J Mol Diagn. 2020;22(9):1114-1125.
VV-MED-163244
Please rate your satisfaction with the content on the following statements:
Very Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Very Satisfied